Here are the screenshots if you want to see. In terms of CPU Performance, Apple A9 leads as far as single-core performance is concerned, but in multi-core Exynos 8890 scores the highest as it has 8 cores compared to 4-core in Snapdragon 820 and 2-core in Apple A9. JavaScript and Browser Performance (Google Octane V2 and Kraken 1.1)Īpple A9 turned out to be a leader as far as browser and javascript performance is concerned In GFXBench Manhattan Benchmark, Snapdragon 820 didn’t lose its first position, but Apple A9 pushed Exynos 8890 behind. Snapdragon 820 vs Exynos 8890 vs Apple A9 GPU Benchmark (GFXBench)Īccording to GFXBench T-Rex Score report, Snapdragon 820 holds the first position, Exynos 8890 holds second, and Apple A9 managed to get the third position So which one is the best in terms of CPU and GPU performance?Īnandtech has performed a couple of benchmark test that includes GFXBench test for GPU Benchmark, Google Octane V2 and Kraken 1.1 test for Javascript and browser performance. And we already know iPhone 6s or 6s Plus features Apple A9 CPU and PowerVR GT7600 GPU. LG G5 features Snapdragon 820 CPU combined with Adreno 530 GPU, and Samsung Galaxy S7 also features the same CPU and GPU, but it has been launched in one more variant with Exynos 8890 CPU plus Mali T880MP12 GPU. In terms of multimedia, Kirin 820 has Yes NPU with storage type as UFS 2.1 and A9 has No NPU and NVMe storage type.Samsung and LG both have announced new Smartphones. Multimedia and Connectivity Comparison: Kirin 820 vs A9 It shows the maximum amount of memory supported by a chipset. Memory Comparison: Kirin 820 vs A9įirst chipset has max size of 12 GB and Apple A9 has max size of 12 GB. Apple A9 has PowerVR GT7600 GPU with GPU Frequency as 650 MHz. Dynamic frequency allows the processor to conserve power and reduce noise when it is under a light load. HiSilicon Kirin 820 has Mali-G57 MP6 GPU with GPU Frequency as 850 MHz. A larger cache time leads to faster performance. Former one has 8 core and 2360 MHz frequency and latter has 2 cores and 1850 MHz frequency. Kirin 820 comes up with the architecture of Valhall and A9 comes up with architecture of Rogue. CPU Comparison: Kirin 820 vs A9ĬPU speed shows how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU. Kirin 820 has an AnTuTu benchmark score of 380901 points with CPU, GPU, Memory, UX score 130435, 116461, 70562, 62183 respectively. Geekbench is a benchmark that measures a processor's single core performance and AnTuTu score is the most popular and trustable benchmarking score which evaluates multi core performance. Check out detailed comparison with key specs below: Benchmark Comparison: Kirin 820 vs A9īenchmark measures the performance of the CPU. HiSilicon Kirin 820 has been announced on March 2020 whereas Apple A9 has been announced on September 2015. Go through detailed comparison below to see the actual difference and similarity between both chipsets. In terms of Graphics, HiSilicon Kirin 820 has Mali-G57 MP6 GPU and Valhall architecture and latter Apple A9 comes up with PowerVR GT7600 GPU and Rogue architecture. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench. HiSilicon Kirin 820 comes up with 8 cores, 2360 MHz frequency and on the other hand, Apple A9 has 2 cores and 1850 MHz frequency. We compared the 8-core Samsung Exynos 1280 (Mali-G68 MP4) with the older 2-core Apple A9 (PowerVR GT7600) SoC. HiSilicon Kirin 820 has a AnTuTu benchmark score of 380901 and Apple A9 has AnTuTu score of 171612. What is the difference between HiSilicon Kirin 820 and Apple A9? Should you buy phone having HiSilicon Kirin 820 or should go for Apple A9? Well, you'll get all your questions cleared here.Compare two chipset models on the basis of their benchmark score (AnTuTu and Geekbench), pros and cons, technical specs categorised into gaming, CPU, GPU, Multimedia, and Connectivity.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |